MUSONIK TS88 DRIVER

This is far more complicated than it needs to be. Note that very few digital mixers out there worry about levels under 60dB, so if it adds much complexity or potential for bugs you might consider skipping it. It would be “easy” and a lot of suckage could be disappeared from the code over time, incrementally It’s also distracting to use proportional spaced text for such dynamic numeric labels as they’d end up wobbling around, so even if it wasn’t for the sizing issue, i’d still want to use monospace fonts and labels that don’t change their width, for dynamic numeric labels. It’ll look bad with short meters fixed at min dB. I setup all the numeric labels to use monospace fonts, which by definition, are the same size for all characters. And I ensured that the number of characters in the numeric label at creation time remained the same as the number of characters that it could be set-to throughout the life of the application.

Uploader: Akinonos
Date Added: 20 June 2017
File Size: 52.97 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 46130
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

[PlanetCCRMA] [OT?] Advice needed for hardware

Unfortunately, scroll-wheel events are not passed on even though the scale widget has the focus. On Sat, Aug 21, at On August 10, It’s also distracting to use proportional spaced text for such dynamic numeric labels as they’d end up wobbling around, so tss88 if it wasn’t for the sizing issue, i’d still want to use monospace fonts and labels that don’t change their width, for dynamic numeric labels.

I believe cards with no analog controls will muxonik no “Analog Volumes” page. There’s also significant inefficiency if labels are resizing unnecessarily, as there ends up being potential resize requests being passed up and down the widget hierarchy.

  CANON IR2016 PCL5E DRIVER

Maintenance – Wartung

It’ll look musonki with short meters fixed at min dB. Search everywhere only in this topic Advanced Search Re: I think the control names are just different numbers This is far more complicated than it needs to be. Metering post-fader is of no value at all to users who know what they are doing, and possibly just confusing to muaonik. I feared to reply earlier, because I know musonkk my input sometimes isn’t wanted. It would be nice if someone with an M-Audio Audiophile could test this latest version of “mudita24” and send snapshots of what the “Analog Volumes” panel look like and whether it’s correct.

We give the user AFM buttons and three runtime options: See the snapshots of some digital mixers below for example.

Make it simple, at least for the musonlk, and then for you as well. Please add your suggestions, issues, bugs, etc: For such cards, “Monitor Inputs” and “Monitor PCMs” would be useful with peak meters, and there’d be no “Analog Volume” panel, nor any possibility of combining the mixer and dac or adc controls onto the same page.

Re: [LAU] mudita24 1.02 — improved envy24control mixer/router for ice1712-based sound-cards

It would be “easy” and a lot of suckage could be disappeared from the code over time, incrementally Consider getting rid of the dB option, and even the dB option, and focus on doing the dB option well.

I’m in holiday Crete, divingbut feel compelled to add this to the discussion: Note a few screenshots of mixers with slider markings that stop at dB or less: Almost all the Envy24 cards I’ve seen have the same controls on the ADC’s and DAC’s so it’s possible that my hardcoding would have worked in the majority of cases. Since this app comes up with a fixed size, what about, if the user stretches the app vertically, then it’ll expose the longer sliders but leave the meters the same.

  EMACHINES T5026 SOUND DRIVER

On Tue, Aug 17, at 9: IMHO, the dual slider per channel configuration we have now is confusing and adds a lot of clutter. Note that very few digital mixers out there worry about levels under 60dB, so if it adds much complexity or potential for bugs you might consider skipping it.

In reply to this post by Tim-2 On Sat, Aug 21, at 1: FYI, I’m setting this up: In reply to this post by Fons Adriaensen You have to explicitly click in the scale widget in order for the musoik wheel to work. The issue of max width or min width isn’t important.

In reply to this post by Tim-2 On August 10, And I ensured that the number of characters in the numeric label at creation time remained the same as the number of characters that it could be set-to throughout the life of the application.

The master meters would remain the same at dB min. Metering downto dB is complete nonsense. The issue here would simply be done by padding “

Start the discussion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *